Publications

The phenomenon of ‘value extraction’ in Open Access

Spitale G., Germani F., Biller-Andorno N. (2026) Accountability in Research 33(7) 10.1080/08989621.2026.2661668

In two lines

Under institutional open-access deals, whoever controls the budget for publication fees can trade it for a place on the author list; we call this ‘value extraction’ and show why existing integrity rules miss it. Early-career researchers, less-resourced institutions and the Global South are most exposed, so we propose firewalls between fee decisions and authorship.

Abstract

Background

Open Access (OA) agreements were introduced to remove financial barriers to scientific dissemination and promote equity in knowledge access. As Article Processing Charges (APCs) have shifted from individual researchers to institutions, access to OA publishing has become an institutional asset, unevenly distributed across institutions, countries, and career stages.

Purpose

This article introduces and defines value extraction in OA — the use of access to APC coverage as leverage to obtain authorship or corresponding authorship without proportional intellectual contribution — and examines it as a structurally enabled integrity risk distinct from previously described forms of authorship abuse.

Approach

We conduct a conceptual and normative analysis of the mechanisms by which OA agreements interact with metric-driven academic evaluation systems and existing research integrity frameworks, identifying governance gaps and distributional inequities produced by these interactions.

Findings

Value extraction in OA is enabled by the convergence of three factors: centralized APC control within institutions, performance metrics that privilege publication counts and corresponding authorship, and integrity frameworks that treat publishing infrastructure as an ethically neutral background condition. Researchers at less-resourced institutions, early-career researchers, and scholars in the Global South face heightened vulnerability. Existing authorship guidelines fail to address mechanisms in which infrastructural access — rather than hierarchy or prestige — functions as leverage for academic credit.

Conclusions

Safeguards are needed at institutional, publisher, and systemic levels, including procedural firewalls between APC decisions and authorship documentation, publisher-level monitoring of authorship patterns, and reform of evaluation frameworks to decouple infrastructural access from academic credit. Future research should investigate the prevalence of value extraction using bibliometric and network-based screening approaches.

Cite

Spitale, G., Germani, F., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2026). The phenomenon of ‘value extraction’ in Open Access. Accountability in Research, 33(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2661668
@article{spitale2026phenomenon,
  author  = {Spitale, G. and Germani, F. and Biller-Andorno, N.},
  title   = {{The phenomenon of ‘value extraction’ in Open Access}},
  journal = {Accountability in Research},
  year    = {2026},
  volume  = {33},
  number  = {7},
  doi     = {10.1080/08989621.2026.2661668}
}

Published in

Accountability in Research

Year

2026

DOI

10.1080/08989621.2026.2661668

Topics