-
The PHERCC matrix. An ethical framework for planning, governing, and evaluating Risk and Crisis Communication in the context of Public Health Emergencies @ EACME 2023
Risk and crisis communication (RCC) is a current ethical issue subject to controversy, mainly due to the tension between individual liberty (a core component of fairness) and effectiveness. In this presentation, based on a paper published in the American Journal of Bioethics, we propose a consistent definition of the RCC process in public health emergencies…
-
Development of an Ethical Framework for Infodemic Management @ WHO CC meeting Rome 2023
I presented these slides at the14th Annual Meeting of the Global Network of WHO Collaborating Centres for Bioethics (Rome 2023). Related resources The OSF repository: https://osf.io/28d73/The RevMaster GitHub code: https://github.com/that-ugly-cat/revmaster The RevMaster assessment (ongoing): https://that-ugly-cat-revbaster-base-revmaster-scfm1v.streamlit.app/
-
The PHERCC Matrix. An Ethical Framework for Planning, Governing, and Evaluating Risk and Crisis Communication in the Context of Public Health Emergencies
Risk and crisis communication (RCC) is a current ethical issue subject to controversy, mainly due to the tension between individual liberty (a core component of fairness) and effectiveness. In this paper we propose a consistent definition of the RCC process in public health emergencies (PHERCC), which comprises six key elements: evidence, initiator, channel, publics, message,…
-
WHO Expert Group on Ethical considerations on social listening and infodemic management
Scope The WHO expert group on ethical considerations of social listening and infodemic management (EG) will advise WHO in producing guidance and related tools with respect to the ethical principles associated with social listening and other related infodemic management activities during health emergencies. In particular, the objectives of the EG on ethical considerations of social listening and infodemic…
-
Boosting Public Discourse: Towards a Targeted, Evidence-Based Strategy to Improve Moral Reasoning
Introduction A booster for public discourse: an interdisciplinary research team develops a goal-oriented, evidence-based strategy to improve moral reasoning. The aim of this project is to contribute to a better understanding of how public discourse can fail due to an unreflective use of key moral terms, and to test a strategy for improving critical thinking…
